Firmly grounded in the one who sees,
there is no necessity left to decide
which of the two proposals is to be followed
What kind of logic has made them mutually exclusive ?
When have we settled in the commanding area of consistency ?
All the statements, alternative or potential developments coexist
without having to elect one of the views
The practitioner embraces these elements
without lingering feverishly in the mud of intellectual interlocking.
He is anchored in the wide, he’s entered the open.
The Wideopen is at work and doors of distinction are not passed seriously.