The scattering of arguments, and the multi-directional approach to argumentation,
even though those elements may be rhetorically acceptable,
are often a major indicator of the lack of inner sitting
within the person resorting to such nervous dispersal in their argumentation.

The fact they are unable to find inner balance is in itself an information about their being at odds with the truth. It reveals their intention is different from what is conveyed by their truckload of arguments.

On another level, relation-wise, it is very sad to notice a deceiving intention,
even if that deceit deals with a seemingly trifling matter.
A person indulging in those ways actually plays the same cards as if he were trying to deceive a whole people.

Franck Joseph
©FJ June 2021 – All Rights Reserved
Articles are available as books and e-books : RECUEILS
This content is made possible through your Participations
Many thanks to all.

Laisser un commentaire

Entrez vos coordonnées ci-dessous ou cliquez sur une icône pour vous connecter:


Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Déconnexion /  Changer )

Image Twitter

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Twitter. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Photo Facebook

Vous commentez à l’aide de votre compte Facebook. Déconnexion /  Changer )

Connexion à %s