I do not see any difference between the conceptual base of non-self, non-attachment, impermanence and that specific to psychological belief in God.
In both cases, we are dealing with a base of ideas, a border to cross, on the other side, such ideas do not exist, It becomes useless to read or talk about the non-self,
I am very grateful to have a God
I can turn to
And I feel sad for those aimlessly turning in a universe without God,
I see all the pretentiousness that was mine.
Notes & Silence 
🤍
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
And yet those aimless would pity, or attack, your viewpoint, making the very same claims of gladness and of pretension…
J’aimeAimé par 2 personnes
The difference being that I have stopped caring.
On the other side of the fence, fighting back and defending territory was a necessity (while gladly pretending there was no ‘self’ that needed to be defended, and dropping keywords of non attachment, illusion, impermanence with an pseudo-inspired look and a half-alive tone in my voice)
Here, the territory is not mine.
But I get your point …and you’re right
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne