Institutional religious practice is reassuring in that it deploys before the practitioner a complete and ready-to-use ecosystem.
This “ready-to-think” aspect through which the different elements of response that the religious framework provides to members fit together is both effective in that it manages to buffer the fears of the herd and disorienting, because it keeps individuals in a bubble of artificiality.
Within this bubble, everything is coherent but when the eyes of the practitioners come into contact with the world beyond the bubble, the coefficient of coherence of the elements of the religious ecosystem decreases and undermines the individual, the religious herd and organization.
If the system does not succeed in reintegrating the individual in the grip of doubt through an arsenal of arguments provided for this purpose, it will then be necessary, from a perspective of safeguarding, to work to ostracize them, by encouraging questioning of their place within this religious ecosystem.
The danger, for the individual who places his hands on the edge of the bubble and looks through it, the one who touches the bubble of the religious ecosystem, will consist of going from system to system, repeating each time this logic of integration-questioning-realization of the illusory character-distancing-ostracization.
Without ever being able to extract oneself, transcend the bubble reality which crosses all ecosystems.
What we observe in the religious context also applies to political, economic ecosystems, professional frameworks, representations…
The other danger will be to make this practice of extracting bubble realities into another illusory bubble in which we will lock ourselves.
This happens when attachment to the bubbles is replaced by attachment to the non-bubble.
The rejection of the illusion ends up cementing a new illusion.
Freedom.
