One of the reasons for the stability of a system (of oppression) over time, for its absence of plasticity, is the fact that the players who are the cogs of transmission in reality are themselves subject to the time factor…. and led by it to wear out.
Since there necessarily comes a moment when such players, prey to disillusionment, physical and psychological aging and hammered by the violence of this system, give up any attempt at changing it, the consequence is therefore that it does not change.
The system brings in other actors, younger, less disillusioned, whom it can use to continue to actualize in reality. It sends these agents as so many surrogate mothers, matrices through which the birth of this system becomes possible. Like a monstrous child, the system then devours them, wears them out, inflicts its ontological violence on them.
The animal system, always refurbished, and always identical, devours its parents and summons others, whom it will devour all the same.
If the talks and ideologies relating to the system exist, this is made possible by the cosmetic game.
A few marginal rules, announcement of renewal, updates, create the lure.
Communication provides the strong arm of this cosmetic illusion.
This illusion is key to the maintaining of the system.
In reality, this decorative device is the alibi for the status quo. Conveying the idea of change is an absolute necessity to guarantee no change.
What is inherent in the system – its violence, its self-reproduction through consumption by its parents – does not change.
Once this is perceived, the only solution for the system agent whose eyes are open becomes extraction.
Extract yourself from the system and don’t miss your exit, neither swap one system for another, nor fall into a subsystem through negligence.
True extraction from a system is always radical.
Notes & Silence 
I’m not sure if you have not come up with a new socio-political theory – though one that seeks to encompass all subsystems – for example, employment. If so, your conclusion would result in the advice to become a hermit, taken to its logical conclusion.
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
What else ?
Is this not the ultimate objective that puts an end to all our objective-based way of life ?
I think I’d appreciate some company though from nearby hermits.
Would you join in ?
Maybe you’re not good-for-nothing enough.
You might have to practice goodfornothingness a bit before applying.
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
Nobody is sufficiently « good for nothing, » every hermit being a practitioner, and, by definition, still practicing, in the attempt to « make perfect. »
J’aimeAimé par 3 personnes
Good for nothing-ness is asymptotic, then.
I ll keep striving « the best I can’t « …
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne