From the depths of the night, I see a part of consciousness that pertains to the body.
Calling to sleep, it is the one who guides biological movements, the « soul » of our body.
Another part of consciousness does not follow this downward movement towards the regenerative layers.
From the beginning of the falling asleep process, where the two consciousnesses seem to move apart, I can observe it.
One sinks,
the other remains,
One accompanies the body,
the other is observing.
I belong to these two consciousnesses, in different ways.
©FJ June 2024
Recueils / Participation/ Groupe
Notes & Silence 
You belong to them? Or, you are them?
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
The ‘I’ you are asking belongs to them.
The ‘I’ that’s investigating for an answer, through realizing its belonging to them knows that it transcends belonging.
It is them.
They, eventually, belong to me.
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
I’m unsure whether you are in danger of trading your non-dualism (do you distinguish that from monism?) for a form of esoteric multiple personality issue…
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
I’m unsure what layer of consciousness the answer I provided actually reflects….
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
Certainty is rarely sure, and almost always over-rated. Embrace the doubt.
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
I believe Doubt has force-embraced me.
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
I’m suspicious towards non dualism
..or, more precisely, people who claim to represent this spiritual approach.
I know there is a distinction that people make between non dualism and monism.
Bit o don’t really understand it.
Nor do I really care.
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
Seriously
The more I investigate, the more fathomless consciousness appears to be.
Fathomless and…seamless.
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
You lean toward panpsychism, then, it seems. Maybe…
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
My leaning highly depends on whom considers it.
Also, On the moment …I’m not fooled anymore by the belief in a consistent personality and associated set of beliefs.
J’aimeJ’aime
An inconsistent personality?
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
as in ‘non substantial.’, illusory…
a recipient of projections which does not stand serious, laser-like investigation
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
Again, I’m fogged by the French ‘consistence’ unrelated to coherence, but meaning density. (?)
J’aimeJ’aime