Social networks are not the space of freedom they claim to be.
These are portholes allowing to observe the dissidents in situ.
Rehabilitation does not take place in any camp,
It is algorithmic in nature.
What content to relay? What should not be displayed ? To whom ? When ? How often ?
On the ground of what state of mind ?
Until the click happens, and the targeted user flips on the right side of the fence.
– ©FJ August 2022
Recueils / Participations
Telegram (Publications et Pratique)
Notes & Silence 
All society is a network, electronic or otherwise.
« Social network » is tautological.
What you say is true of all contact between individuals.
Freedom is the path of the hermit.
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
There has to be phase when the hermit joins society back.
..Or is it just me desperately applying the ‘bodhisattva’ content to an incompatible reality..maybe?
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
I’ll leave you to muse on the concept of the bodhisattva.
The hermit is free to curtail his freedom either through a refusal to engage, or acceptance of engagement, with society. Though some minimal interaction is, likely, necessary for survival.
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
Maybe this whole ‘bodhisattva thing’ is, at least in its written expression, a form of, as you name it, musing.
In any case, it remains an ex-post construction.
And one should always be reminded to investigate the initial inner reality those terms have been attempting to point to.
Cherishing the term is a a form of golden calf worshipping.
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
100%
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne