Here is a way of understanding the Buddhist concept of emptiness: none of the 5 aggregates: sensations, perceptions, mental formations, forms, consciousness… is worthy of the potential for diversion that, through ignorance, we attribute to it.
None of them is really capable of marking deep nature.
©FJ March 2024
Recueils / Participation/ Groupe De Pratique
Notes & Silence 
This renders the self as something apart from all of these. I am not my senses, thoughts etc, but (presumably) that which perceives them. Which puts consciousness in a strange position. What other than consciousness may perceive?
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
I believe Consciousness is fathomless
There’s always a deeper layer…as far as I can tell.
J’aimeAimé par 2 personnes
I would suggest it is the underpinning of all that « is ».
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
I would not suggest anything else
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne
Does not mean you would suggest the same…!!!
J’aimeAimé par 1 personne