An object is an aggregator of attention.
Attention focuses on the object.
Attention is an aggregator of tension.
Tension focuses on attention.
Thus, not all objects are equal
At least, as long as not all objects are equal,
Not all objects are equal.
The sound of a passing car engine gathers attention, while in the distance, tension focuses on the increasing roar of the approaching vehicle. This increased tension, in reaction to the perceived threat, compensates for and buffers the aggression of the sonic invasion of our conscious space.
The rise in tension is a reaction to the interaction of attention with the object.
Entering into communication with the object through attention, placing interest in it, is tantamount to opening a door to a potential intruder.
Once this intrusion enters our lives, tension becomes our defense mechanism if we realize too late that its intentions are not good.
The next step is to see that these intrusions, subjected to rigorous analysis, are empty. The car, the driver, the engine, the wheels, the road—none of them « want » anything. Objectively, there is no intention.
Even an extreme scenario involving a sadistic driver will ultimately reveal such ignorance that, in reality, no intention can take root there.
Thus, whether attention is focused on a meadow flower or the engines of the city, it matters little.
It is also important to note the nature of this attention :
-Focused, fine, acute attention,
-or broad, welcoming, equanimous attention.
These two types of attention do not offer the same surface for tension to adhere to. With the former, it easily escalates, while with the latter… Secondly, it struggles to build a defense mechanism, precisely because there has been no perceived attack, no experienced intrusion.
Broad attention is the path to freedom.
Confinement within circles of constrained interaction is the result of focused attention.
